3. Sifat Melawan Hukum Material vs HAM Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Nama  : Widiada Gunakaya Biodata  :   A.Widiada Gunakaya SA, SH. MH. Dosen Tetap Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung (STHB). Lektor Kepala dalam mata kuliah Kriminologi dan Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Sarjana Hukum (S1) dari Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung tahun 1982. Magister Ilmu Hukum (S2) dari UNDIP tahun 1992. Saat ini sedang menempuh Program Doktor (S3) di UNPAR.   Abstraksi     Today, in Indonesia corruption case is categorized as an extra ordinary crime because it does not only inflict the government financial loss but also violates social-economic rights widely. According to the Government of the Repubic of Indonesia, corruption case is categorized as a gross crime that must be handled by extra ordinary measures. In the Act of Anti-Corruption, law instruments used as means of criminal policy is; by determination of the unlawfulness of formal and material laws. Although this criminal act is not regulated in the the Act, and it is not suitable with sense of justice or social values in the society, it can be sentenced. The decision of Judicial Review of Constitution Court states that the unlawfulness of ‘material law’does not tie up as it is against human rights primarily security right of just assurance of law (The 1945 Constitution, article 28). The problem is; assurance of law of people welfare?   Download Attachment